On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 13:57 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: > On man 14 sep 2009 12:39:21 CEST, Martin Gregorie wrote > > AWL, which is simply an averager, can get badly off target with > > some mixes of ham/spam. It did with my mail feed, so I disabled it. > > in that case you dont understand what awl does, why not adjust awl factor ? > I understand exactly what it does, thankyou. Attempting to mitigate an occasional spammy message from a correspondent is no use to me at all. I have an automatic system that whitelists any address I've previously sent mail to and doesn't affect any other senders.
Martin
