Nobody has yet proposed HOSTKARMA to become enabled by default. I am
only interested at the moment in testing how good it is in masschecks.
I would like to similarly add other DNSBL's that I haven't tried before
like spameatingmonkey or intercept to the masschecks. If you look
around online there isn't any good measure of DNSBL quality out there.
Our weekly_mass_check and sandbox is a very easy to way to measure this
stuff.
http://stats.dnsbl.com/
1067 hams is really the sample size he uses to measure false positives?
We can do a LOT better than this.
Any other free DNSBL's people are interested in testing?
Warren Togami
wtog...@redhat.com
