On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 14:24 +0100, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 07:26 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
> > [...] Why are we covering for their mistakes and
> > supporting a company that profits from sending spam, even if its only
> > sometimes, by whitelisting them?
"We" aren't. If you would have closely followed the thread, you would
have understood that this is about a DNS [BW]L listing that is *not*
part of the stock rules.
We don't operate white or blacklists. Neither do we use the list in
question by default.
> [...] but as it's being discussed here - I'm guessing
> somewhere in SA something is 'greasing the wheels' for them.
This is plain FUD.
Richard, you're eloquently showing off you didn't read the thread.
You're even clearly stating you don't know, but yet accuse SA of helping
an unrelated business.
Stop the guessing and do check the code and rules before claiming
anything.
guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
