Luis campo wrote: > * > skip_rbl_checks 1 > * RBL checks are quite useful. Why are you skipping them?
> *#Con esto evalua cada mensaje, se requiere un 5.0 para marcarlo como > spam > required_hits 3 > * Spamassassin is designed to score spam at 5 points. If you lower this score, you are risking losing legitimate email. You are usually better off determining why the spam isn't scoring as high as it should. > * > ######################################################################## > # Puede ser cuenta o dominio como whitelist > whitelist_from victorlewi...@xxxxxxxxx > whitelist_from e...@xxxxxxxxxxx > whitelist_from arcemart...@xxxxxxxxx > whitelist_from *...@es.mcafee.com > whitelist_from *...@mcafee.com > whitelist_from alpine...@xxxxxxxxx > whitelist_from *croda.com.br > whitelist_from *...@pcmodasac.com > whitelist_from *...@mmsc.telefonicamovistar.com.pe > whitelist_from *...@ideasclaro.com.pe > whitelist_from *...@surfcontrol.com > whitelist_from *...@inkanatura.com.pe > whitelist_from *...@hanwha.co.kr > whitelist_from *...@innoviafilms.com > whitelist_from *...@fmm.com.pa > whitelist_from *...@cmoviles.net.pe > whitelist_from *...@enerquimica.com <mailto:*...@enerquimica.com> > ################################################### > * whitelist_from is dangerous and should never be used unless absolutely necessary. Use whitelist_from_rcvd, whitelist_from_spf, or whitelist_from_auth instead. If you can show us some of the spam that is getting through (including headers), we may be able to offer more suggestions. Put the spam on pastbin.com or a similar service and post the link -- don't post the spam directly to the list. -- Bowie
