On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 11:28 +0100, Yet Another Ninja wrote: > > The correct answer will be precisely why this state of affairs exists. > > - because developers think/have thought its a good idea. > > - because nobody other than you makes such a noise about it. And YOU who > are so against, have you submitted a bug to have whatever reconsidered. I don't recall that I was making much noise about it, I said my piece and others with to carry it on - but I'm more than happy to do that.
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Chr. von Stuckrad
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Per Jessen
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Charles Gregory
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Per Jessen
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? jdow
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? McDonald, Dan
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Per Jessen
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? jdow
- RE: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? R-Elists
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Charles Gregory
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? jdow
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Kris Deugau
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER LuKreme
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER Bowie Bailey
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER Robert Lopez
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER jdow
- actual facts (was Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER) J.D. Falk
- Re: actual facts (was Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER... John Hardin
- Re: actual facts (was Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER... J.D. Falk