On 2010-03-12 16:48, Ray Dzek wrote:
I just received the dreaded URIBL "You send us to many DNS queries"
notice. This is fine. We have been growing and I am sure our
queries have gone up. But when looking at their data feed service
options the first thing I noticed was that there is no fee structure.
I don't know about you, but that is always a red flag in my world.
Before I even get past the first paragraph it already smells like a
"shakedown".
But...
My real question is how badly is my SA environment going to be
impacted by turning URIBL off? What increase in spam should I
expect?
These stats are for small trap box which only accepts mail from bots and
rejects stuff listed by DNSWL and other public WLs. Since midnight CET-
These are only URI BL tats - so you woun't see other dnsbls like
Spamcop, etc.
Some zones may sound familiar - others are "private".
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
1 URI_IN_MSG 47943 93.48 95.22 53.92
2 ANY_URIBL_COM 46460 88.38 92.27 0.09
3 URIBL_BLACK 45186 85.95 89.74 0.00
4 ANY_SPAMHAUS 42299 80.46 84.01 0.05
5 URIBL_DBL 39555 75.24 78.56 0.00
6 HTML_MESSAGE 39405 76.83 78.26 44.46
7 URIBL_SBL 38680 73.58 76.82 0.00
8 CM_URI_DNSBL 38636 73.49 76.73 0.00
9 AXB_BLACK_NSIP 38439 73.12 76.34 0.00
10 URIBL_SPAMEATINGMONKEY_RED 38250 72.76 75.97 0.00
11 ANY_SURBL 33742 64.24 67.01 1.31
12 URIBL_SC_SWINOG 33265 63.28 66.07 0.00
13 URIBL_IVMURI 32987 62.75 65.52 0.00
14 RDNS_NONE 31733 62.82 63.02 58.11
15 URIBL_JP_SURBL 30408 57.84 60.39 0.00
16 URIBL_SPAMEATINGMONKEY_BLACK 30338 57.71 60.25 0.00
17 URIBL_DRS_BLACK 30272 57.58 60.12 0.00
18 MIME_HTML_ONLY 29485 56.13 58.56 1.08
19 URIBL_WS_SURBL 28959 55.14 57.52 1.31
20 URIBL_AB_SURBL 27200 51.74 54.02 0.00
21 AXB_BLACK_NS 25076 47.70 49.80 0.00
22 HK_NAME_DRUGS 16027 30.49 31.83 0.00
23 RDNS_DYNAMIC 13334 26.09 26.48 17.25
24 URIBL_OB_SURBL 12701 24.16 25.23 0.00
25 FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 12681 25.47 25.19 31.89
