On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 16:05 -0400, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> > Btw, the three rules JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_{1,2,3} have a score of zero
> > as per Justin's request (Bug 6155 c 38, c72, c89, c124).
> > Not sure if people using the channel realize that scores
> > need to be bumped up. Btw, I prefer to avoid them monopolizing
> > the score when more than one hits:
> >
> > score JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_1 0.1
> > score JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_2 0.1
> > score JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_3 0.1
> > meta JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_ANY JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_1 || JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_2 ||
> > JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_3
> > score JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_ANY 3.0
> Bug 6155 is now closed, but the SOUGHT rules still have a score of 0.
> Anyone have an idea on when these rules will be activated again?
The zero score request applies *only* to the SOUGHT_FRAUD sub-set. It
does *not* affect SOUGHT. Those do have scores according to the GA run.
Also, this applies *only* to 3.3, where this moved into stock. Again,
the dedicated sa-update channel (also suitable for 3.2) is *not*
affected and still has the same scores it used to.
Now, regarding activating again -- just do. They are merely disabled by
default (in 3.3 stock). You can "activate" them on your site, simply by
dropping score lines into your local config.
guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
