Hi, Remember to respond to the mailing list ... so other users can follow this also ...
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Keith De Souza <kbdeso...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > >>> But are there are reason for dropping it? > > I'm having a few errors in my Exim logs from legitamate senders not coming > through: > > =========== > 2010-03-31 01:22:25 1Nwlbc-0001QS-Ua > H=host81-136-197-86.in-addr.btopenworld.com (mail.duke.tv) [81.136.197.86] > F=<l...@dukeandearl.com> temporarily rejected after DATA > =========== > > And after checking my SA logs: > > =========== > Mar 31 01:25:51 mailserver spamd[5379]: spamd: result: . -4 - > GENESIS_PHONENUMBER07 > scantime=300.0,size=24337,user=nobody,uid=8,required_score=3.2,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=42308,mid=<c7d27527.8a78%l...@dukeandearl.com>,autolearn=unavailable > ========== Your required score is very slow ... but thats not the problem. > I'm trying to understand why is it taking 300.0 seconds to scan a message > only 24Kb in size?? This is not the way to go ... there could be other problems ... like SA rules, RBL's timing out ... Are you running "sa-update" ? > I'm begeining to think that because SA is taking so long to scan the > message, it is timing out > and hence Exim returning a "temporarily reject after DATA". > > My thoughs so far is to perhaps reducing the file size that SA takes to scan > and see if the scan time reduces. Are there lots of mails in the queue ? > I may be wrong in my troublshooting methods but I'm not sure why this is > happeninig at present. > > Many Thanks > > > > > On 31 March 2010 13:30, Mikael Syska <mik...@syska.dk> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Keith De Souza >> <kbdeso...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Guys, >> > >> >> [snip] >> >> > >> > I've read somewhere that the default setting for SA to scan a message is >> > 500k. >> > >> > Can I reduce this, so that SA scans messages 100k and below? >> >> Have you tried google first ? >> >> http://www.google.dk/#hl=da&safe=off&q=spamd+scan+messages+size&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=15904d39482f0df0 >> >> Maybe this one: http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/spamc.html >> >> I'm no expert at spamc ... but this seems to be the right settings to go >> for ... >> >> But are there are reason for dropping it? >> >> > Many Thanks in advance >> > >> > >> > >> >> mvh >> Mikael Syska > > mvh
