On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> get us added to lists, but Michael stated "then, check the blacklists to
> see how to get removed." as if we are already on a list. We are not.
>
> Back to the main issue.
>
> Here is an example pastbin. http://pastebin.com/mJqRPzkv
>
> I found this message in the logs and it comes from yahoo. I don't think
> I will focus on our forms because general mail also has its received
> headers stripped. So the question is is what is doing this? I need help
> to determine how to isolate this problem down. If it is postfix, I will
> go to there lists etc... I have not implemented any rules that strip
> received headers nor do I want to.
>
> Thanks,
> RCR
Given that it looks like something is taking the original "To:" header,
mutating it into "X-Original-To:" then adding that bogus
"To: <undisclosed recipients:>" and adding a
"X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at activedatatech.net" header
I would guess that it's your amavisd-new process (or something in
its path) that is doing the header damaging.
Check the Amavisd site/list for trouble-shooting hints & tips.
There may be a way to put a 'tee' filter before & after amavisd in your
postfix confiuration.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
