Hmm, but the subject is rewritten with "*** SPAM ***"
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 06:59:32PM +0000, Michael Scheidell wrote: > Its marked no spam. So where is the problem? > > -- > Michael Scheidell > CTO SECNAP Network Security > 561-948-2259<tel:5619482259> > > > -----Original message----- > From: Sergei <ser...@publicschoolworks.com> > To: Michael Scheidell <michael.scheid...@secnap.com> > Cc: "users@spamassassin.apache.org" <users@spamassassin.apache.org> > Sent: Mon, Apr 18, 2011 18:56:47 GMT+00:00 > Subject: Re: whitelist > > Thanks for a quick reply. Here are the headers (I've replaced the sender's > user id with SOMEUSER): > > Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=silent.office.publicschoolworks.com) > by dev.publicschoolworks.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) > (envelope-from <someu...@mail.ru>) > id 1QBrsv-0005FR-R2 > for sergei@localhost; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:05:13 -0400 > Received: from 64.18.218.22 [64.18.218.22] > by silent.office.publicschoolworks.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.9-rc2) > for <sergei@localhost> (single-drop); Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:05:13 -0400 > (EDT) > Received: from [217.69.129.68] (helo=f9.mail.ru) > by publicschoolworks.com with esmtp (Exim 4.73) > (envelope-from <someu...@mail.ru>) > id 1QBrrx-0007Ui-Ey > for ser...@publicschoolworks.com; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:04:13 -0400 > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; > s=mail; > > h=Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Mime-Version:To:From; > +bh=Wj3bf777uBMhFh4gXD8aW8FRJbmnzVaxNz55aqRK6O4=; > > b=hgCB+/VxNs1WA+F7YbZ2WL2EWDNtHc3nufO5Wt1IAyyvX2NMxXtolvooMm40QIK7VWCz9FBydC5ac1lbaHBisBDIk5Obs4yQ+CoF1IQxVTJcfs1hMs2sb5wYBME9L9Ss; > Received: from mail by f9.mail.ru with local > id 1QBrpH-0005WZ-00 > for ser...@publicschoolworks.com; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:01:27 +0400 > Received: from [92.113.60.56] by e.mail.ru with HTTP; > Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:01:27 +0400 > From: SOMEUSER_FIRST_NAME SOMEUSER_LAST_NAME <someu...@mail.ru> > To: Sergei Gerasenko <ser...@publicschoolworks.com> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 > X-Originating-IP: [92.113.60.56] > Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:01:27 +0400 > References: <e1qbufb-0001xl-00.someuser-mail...@f238.mail.ru> > <e1qbrxu-0007hr-00.someuser-mail...@f271.mail.ru> > <20110418164945.GA18977@localhost> > In-Reply-To: <20110418164945.GA18977@localhost> > Reply-To: SOMEUSER_FIRST_NAME SOMEUSER_LAST_NAME <someu...@mail.ru> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 > Message-Id: <e1qbrph-0005wz-00.someuser-mail...@f9.mail.ru> > X-Spam: Not detected > X-Mras: Ok > > =========================== > > In my user_prefs: > > whitelist_from someu...@mail.ru > whitelist_from_spf someu...@mail.ru > > I did restart spamd. > > Thanks! > Sergei > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 02:48:05PM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > On 4/18/11 2:44 PM, Sergei wrote: > > >Hello everybody, > > > > > >I can't figure out why even after I put an address into a whitelist > > >(whitelist_from), it's still marked as SPAM. Sorry if this is a common > > >question. Would be grateful for any suggestions. > > > > > >Thanks, > > > Sergei > > need a LOT more info. > > > > post full headers (not email) and post the EXACT LINE YOU USED in local.cf > > > > you did restart spamd after, right? > > > > > > > > -- > > Michael Scheidell, CTO > > o: 561-999-5000 > > d: 561-948-2259 > > ISN: 1259*1300 > > >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation > > > > * Best Intrusion Prevention Product, Networks Product Guide > > * Certified SNORT Integrator > > * Hot Company Award, World Executive Alliance > > * Best in Email Security, 2010 Network Products Guide > > * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). > > For Information please see > > http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ > > ______________________________________________________________________
