Hi,
>> > if can(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL::has_tflags_domains_only)
>> > urirhssub URIBL_DBL_REDIR dbl.spamhaus.org. A 127.0.1.3
>> > body URIBL_DBL_REDIR eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_DBL_REDIR')
>> > describe URIBL_DBL_REDIR Spamhaus spammed redirector domain
>> > tflags URIBL_DBL_REDIR net domains_only
>> > score URIBL_DBL_REDIR 2.0
>> > endif
>>
>> this rule just works, thanks.
>>
>> Isn't it a pretty normal check to be done? I ask since my fear is that my
>> setup is someway wrong, or at least poor. I just use default rules from
>> debian spamassassin + sa-update but many times I see spam messages pass
>> throught that are clearly spam and hit very few rules.
>
> The 127.0.1.3 was a recent addition to dbl.spamhaus.org (March 2011).
> Default rules do not recognize it yet.
This isn't the type of thing that would be added to a sa-update? Are
there other URIBLs that you think should be added?
It seems quite useful. Maybe Warren can add this info to his spamtips.org?
Thanks,
Alex
