On 06/30/2011 06:29 PM, Axb wrote:
> Your debug data sez:
>
> On 2011-06-30 18:19, J4K wrote:
>> Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (1 message(s) examined)
>
> permissions?
>
> -D will usually give you a good pointer on what's going on.
> (thanks JM for beating that into my single cell brain)
Hi,

    You have one more brain cell than I have.  Thank-you for getting me
to use the -D option.

I finally sorted out the database so that it really had the rights it
needed.  ( /me coughs and hides in the corner. )

# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version
0.000          0          8          0  non-token data: nspam
0.000          0       2645          0  non-token data: nham
0.000          0     125244          0  non-token data: ntokens
0.000          0 1085514555          0  non-token data: oldest atime
0.000          0 1309458529          0  non-token data: newest atime
0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last journal
sync atime
0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last expire
atime delta
0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last expire
reduction count

I have passed several hundred pieces of spam messages into the dB.
However it says that there is less than 200 spam messages (8 to be precise).

Jun 30 20:48:08.430 [4218] dbg: bayes: using username: spamd
Jun 30 20:48:08.430 [4218] dbg: bayes: learner_new: got
store=Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::MySQL=HASH(0x3db1448)
Jun 30 20:48:08.431 [4218] dbg: plugin:
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes=HASH(0x4438cf0) implements
'learner_is_scan_available', priority 0
Jun 30 20:48:08.433 [4218] dbg: bayes: database connection established
Jun 30 20:48:08.433 [4218] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
Jun 30 20:48:08.434 [4218] dbg: bayes: Using userid: 187
Jun 30 20:48:08.434 [4218] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only
8 spam(s) in bayes DB < 200
Jun 30 20:48:08.434 [4218] dbg: config: score set 0 chosen.
Jun 30 20:48:08.434 [4218] dbg: message: main message type: text/plain
Jun 30 20:48:08.435 [4218] dbg: message: ---- MIME PARSER START ----
Jun 30 20:48:08.435 [4218] dbg: message: parsing normal part
Jun 30 20:48:08.435 [4218] dbg: message: ---- MIME PARSER END ----
Jun 30 20:48:08.435 [4218] dbg: plugin:
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval=HASH(0x44c5480) implements
'check_start', priority 0
Jun 30 20:48:08.435 [4218] dbg: plugin:
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody=HASH(0x4600b60) implements
'check_start', priority 0
Jun 30 20:48:08.448 [4218] dbg: bayes: database connection established
Jun 30 20:48:08.448 [4218] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
Jun 30 20:48:08.448 [4218] dbg: bayes: Using userid: 187
Jun 30 20:48:08.449 [4218] dbg: bayes: not available for scanning, only
8 spam(s) in bayes DB < 200
Jun 30 20:48:08.449 [4218] dbg: plugin:
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check=HASH(0x4408480) implements
'check_main', priority 0
Jun 30 20:48:08.449 [4218] dbg: config: trusted_networks are not
configured; it is recommended that you configure trusted_networks manually



*** On another note:
I noticed in the debug output that it mentioned the trusted networks
bit, of which there are none other than the email server itself:
    config: trusted_networks are not configured; it is recommended that
you configure trusted_networks manually
Is it worth putting the servers IP address in the confuration? 

local.cf: trusted_networks my.ip.addr.ess


Reply via email to