On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:35:01 +0300 Henrik K <h...@hege.li> wrote: [...]
> Feel free to donate your code for SA and stop the pointless bashing. Um? I'm not "bashing" SA. I think it's a fine piece of work. All I asked is if anyone has made a CDB back-end for SA and I explained why I thought it might be a good idea. Don't take it so personally. As for donating our code, I can't do that because we wrote our own Bayes implementation and our storage back-end won't fit into SA's design. > I like Bayes working realtime. I can live with a 10-minute delay. I don't believe real-time training improves detection. But anyway, adding a CDB back-end doesn't mean you'd have to remove other back-ends. People could choose according to their tastes. > Claiming SA "ignores large sites" because it doesn't have a complex > CDB backend is ridiculous. I'm not at all claiming SA ignores large sites. I'm claiming that people with *your* attitude ("Other 99.9% of user don't really care...") are ignoring large sites. -- David.