On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:12:56 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
DNSWL is scaned in deep received, but none have reporteed this :(
DNSWL for SA is implemented with first-trusted on all the tests in SA
I found. I don't see any deep-header parsing.
if its was we all need to use trusted_networks even more, its
firstuntrusted, not first hop ;/
whitelists should be fitsthop only, no ?
#6718 should have being resolved wont-fix
No, it was a duplicate complaint. Marking it a duplicate was
accurate IMO.
spamassassin is not a book of howto setup dns servers or is it now ?
#6668 agree on comment #1, the rest is just fuss imho
As I wrote comment 1, I have to agree it was brilliant ;-)
atleast some have humor in this month :-)
