>>> On 3/31/2012 at 8:22 AM, Michael Scheidell <michael.scheid...@secnap.com>
wrote:
> On 3/31/12 8:04 AM, joea wrote:
>> starting below my local and MP details?   Hopefully, the latter, as the 
> former leaves me feeling a bit exposed.
>>
> we already know everything you think you want to hide.

Well, let's hope not . . . 
 
> if you need help, you need enough full information.
> Or, you make the pastebin 'private', and send the link offlist to 
> someone who has volunteered to help.  . . . .
>

If there are more volunteers, beyond the presumed one . . . feel free to . . .

> 
> munging the headers with 'somehost.somenet.sometld [1.1.1.1]' helps no 
> one at all.
> 
> What information is important might not be apparent to you.  

Well, true as that may be, I cannot fathom how munging any IP or
hostname  between final drop and fetch from MSP could have any bearing 
on the issue.

>If it was, you might have solved the problem yourself. 

Perhaps . . . 

Beyond that, where can I find the difference, in a SPAM learning sense,
between "sa-learn --spam filename" and "spamassassin -r < filename"?

If I do the sa-learn on the same file, after doing spamassassin, it tells me 0 
tokens.
If I then do "sa-learn --forget filename", then "sa-learn --spam filename" it 
tells me 1 token learned.

I infer from this they perform similar or the same function, from a Bayes sense.

joe a.

> -- 
> Michael Scheidell, CTO
> o: 561-999-5000
> d: 561-948-2259
>  >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
> 



Reply via email to