On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Den 2012-07-12 00:22, dar...@chaosreigns.com skrev:
That's a *really* unprofessional way to say "Everything in this domain
passes SPF."
it will be more unproffessional to treat +all as a spammy sign, atleast in
spf terms
Not if it actually occurs more with spam than with ham.
spamassassin does not need to test +all, show an example where spammers can
use +all to get negative scores in spamassassin and i will vote +1 for the
test
They may not be specifically targeting SpamAssassin.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Christian martyrs don't explode. -- Marisol
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days until the 67th anniversary of the dawn of the Atomic Age
