>>> On 4/19/2013 at 6:29 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: >>>>> On 4/18/2013 at 7:21 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: >>> Train your bayes database, if you get many spams with this small score. > > On 18.04.13 21:45, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: >>All I can do is feed it. > > that is what you should do. You need to train on both spam and ham, since > the BAYES filter must know how they differ... > >
That has always given me pause, as I get very little ham. Got one this AM. which I will feed but that's the first in at least a month. I gather that aged info is not useful? joe a.
