On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 03:32 -0200, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Sunday, November 10 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> For all messages that I received since I started using SA (about 20
> messages, of which 5 were false-negatives, and the rest were
> true-negatives), [...]
Given you state below no spam has been identified yet, you're confusing
terms.
SA tests for spam. Thus a positive result is "classified spam", and "not
spam" is a negative test result. True means the result is correct,
whereas false indicates a mis-classification by the test.
False (mis-classified) negatives (rated not-spam) are spam, which SA
failed to classify spam.
If you prefer, refer to them as missed spam, or (in)correctly classified
ham and spam.
> I do receive spam. About 1 or 2 per day. But so far SA hasn't been
> able to catch any of them, and all spam I receive has been marked as ham
> so far. The message headers are OK, there is nothing apparently wrong
> with SA, but it is just not catching most of my spam. I assume this is
> normal behavior since I just started using SA a few days ago.
No, that is not normal. In fact, since no spam has been identified at
all yet, there is something really broken or mis-configured.
I suggest to start a new thread (no reply) about this. For starters,
we'd need details about your environment and how you set up SA. Plus
some X-Spam-Status headers of ham and (missed) spam.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
