On Monday 24 March 2014 12:18:05 Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 03/24/2014 12:14 PM, Nuno Fernandes wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 March 2014 07:50:50 Matt Kettler wrote:
> >>> Does this do it?
> >>>
> >>> score AWL 0
> >>> meta LOCAL_SCORE_AWL AWL && !URIBL_DBL_SPAM
> >>> score LOCAL_SCORE_AWL -10
> >>>
> >>> where -10 is whatever score AWL usually has (I forget)
> >>
> >> AWL has a variable score, so you can't negate it by a fixed-score rule..
> >> Fundamentally, it is a past-history based score averaging system, hence
> >> the scores for it constantly change.
> >
> > That's why i would like to remove it in certain scenarios. If it the mail
> > hits my local RBL i would like to remove AWL all together.
> >
> > Guess i will have to hack AWL.pm :(
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nuno Fernandes
>
> If the rbl gets preference above spamassassin scoring, then why don't
> you just implement the rbl as a separate check in your mta, and make the
> mta reject/quarantine the message without consulting spamassassin at
> all? Just an idea;)
>
> Tom
Hello,
You are correct but the rbl in the mta (in my postfix configuration) would
bounce the email to the sender. My spamassassin+amavis quarantines it so that
the user can release it later on.
Nevertheless i think the following one liner would do the trick (have to test
it though):
--- Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/AWL.pm.orig 2014-03-24 11:31:18.000000000
+0000
+++ Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/AWL.pm 2014-03-24 11:31:20.000000000 +0000
@@ -437,6 +437,7 @@
# or if the test is marked as "noautolearn"
next if !$scores->{$test};
next if exists $tflags->{$test} && $tflags->{$test} =~ /\bnoautolearn\b/;
+ return 0 if $tflags->{$test} =~ /\bnoawl\b/;
$points += $scores->{$test};
}
If some other test (that has score!=0) has the tflag noawl, this plugin
returns immediately.
Any ideas or problems is this one liner?
Thanks,
Nuno Fernandes
--
