I am using the following RBLs:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Steve Bergman <sbergma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/01/2014 11:15 PM, Daniel Staal wrote: > > You probably can. ;) But I'm sure Windstream didn't get you every >> piece of mail immediately after it was sent - just as soon as they could >> after they got it. >> > > Yeah. I'm conservatively holding myself to higher standards than is > perhaps warranted. But I think that those standards are along the lines of > what my long-time customer thought they were getting from Windstream. And > it Winstream had too many issues, I think I would have heard about it. > > And their servers *did* become unavailable for short periods from time to > time. > > But once I'm satisfied that I've reached parity, the real fun starts. We > were on POP3. Now we're on our own IMAP. And there is Dovecot full text > search in our near future. It will be fun to be able to go beyond and show > off a little. My client company's CEO does a lot of full text searching > over his email history. > > > I'm not even saying I like greylisting - I'm just > >> saying you should work to set user expectations to reality, >> > > When trust died on the Internet, telnet died, but somehow the unbelievably > naive email system did not. It was never prepared for spammer abuse. And > we're still accommodating to 7 bit systems for crying out loud. If it were > material I suppose it would make a fine antique in someone's collection. > Right along side the PDP-11. > > > which is > >> that email sometimes takes time to get delivered and (rarely) gets >> lost. If something is absolutely time-critical, they should treat email >> as a backup, >> > > I think that It's largely a matter of *peoples* expectations and > understanding, If a mail gets missed, folks can understand an occasional "I > never got your email, we'll send someone over right away". > > What I object to is the idea of regular and unpredictable delays as > introduced by greylisting. And it's just plain ugly from an aesthetic > standpoint. But then so are our current email protocols. But I do think > that can be fixed. > > Never did like texting. And that's the alternative. > > -Steve > >
