On 12. feb. 2015 20.17.44 Dave Warren <da...@hireahit.com> wrote:
However, using a DMARC "quarantine" or "reject" policy causes breakage
when users attempt to participate in discussion based mailing lists, or
other systems which modify messages (adding subject tags, adding
footers, removing existing signatures), so DMARC quarantine or reject
policies are only really useful for domains which send mail in
predictable and largely automated ways, which are frequently forged,
with live users living at another domain for their own mailboxes.
if the maillist preserve dkim signed mails, then dmarc will pass, but yes
sadly there is maillists that breaks dkim, this is not a design fault, but
only a admin miss understanding that its not maillist server admins faults,
but it is
spf is transperent to maillist, and since dkim have no ip at all it will be
aswell if not breaked
mailman have support for take over ownerships of users dkim signed mails,
but it will create more problems then it solves, since not many mua clients
then know how to reply to maillist or to the origin sender to make a
private mail
thanks to this maillist here its not a problem here, i get dmarc pass, super
note dmarc can break on spf if maillist is not spf protected, but the
origin sender was
