On 23.03.15 16:12, Shane Williams wrote:
I've been running emails through a 3.4.0 installation and an older
version simultaneously in order to compare and tweak as necessary and
I've noticed quite a few instances where DATE_IN_FUTURE or
DATE_IN_PAST tests are hit when no such discrepancy seems to exist.
I've been meaning to dig deeper, and then today I got a totally legit
email from someone where all the hops are internal to our network and
I trust that times on all the machines are all within a minute or less
of each other. All the timestamps I can see are within 10 seconds of
each other, so perhaps it's a timestamp formatting issue that's
triggering these, but I'm at a loss. Adding to the mystery is the
fact that other emails from the same user (using the same
mailer/computer) don't fire the DATE_IN_FUTURE tag.
Am I missing something or is this a real false positive?
http://pastebin.com/GsmzaUSs
do you use spamass-milter? I have problems that spamass-milter uses invalid
Received: date when the message is received over TLS connection.
(this message was received over TLS connection).
I have worked around this by not letting sendmail send date to milter.
another possibility is that sendmail has rewritten Date: header to actual
date, when it found the header incorrect.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way.
