On Fri, 1 May 2015, RW wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2015 09:55:31 -0500
Larry Rosenman wrote:
X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (3.8/5.0) BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2
Consider increasing the score of BAYES_99 above 5. For me BAYES_99 has
an FP rate that's negligible compared with the FP rate of spamassassin
itself.
...and if you don't want to bump BAYES_99 that much, bump BAYES_999 - it's
a little bit safer.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm seriously considering getting one of those bright-orange prison
overalls and stencilling PASSENGER on the back. Along with the paper
slippers, I ought to be able to walk right through security.
-- Brian Kantor in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 days until the 70th anniversary of VE day
