On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 10:47 -0400, Bill Cole wrote: > Your response is a non sequitur. > Why do you say that? You suggested using what look to be hard limits on the header's size, though admittedly large ones, which puts my comments entirely on topic. You might not agree, but that's another matter entirely.
I was pointing out that, for people who care about the size of recipient lists, it would be more useful for SA to count the names in recipient headers and make this count available to rules and/or to limit it with a defaulted parameter than to do asnything with the list size as measured in characters: its far more meaningful to be able to say 'no more than 3 recipients' than it it to say 'recipient list not to exceed 150 characters'. Martin
