Hey Reindl,
if you are trying to insult people at all costs, you should read and
understand their posts in full before doing so at least, to not look
like a jackass additional to an impolite person.
What I wrote is:
>> ... but created the exemptions as listed at the very bottom of that
>> site, to make sure my bind don't forward requests on these services
>> to my ISP's DNS ...
> and *no* the ISP nameserver is *not* a lot faster in most cases
Also, you shouldn't make assumptions without measuring something:
1. without forwarding:
;; Query time: 543 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
2. with forwarding to my ISP's servers:
;; Query time: 2 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
That's 271 times faster than root-servers's lookup.
Marc
Am 15.09.2015 um 12:55 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 15.09.2015 um 12:51 schrieb Marc Richter:
I recently read the following in all my filtered Mail:
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
So I read what's written there and setup a local DNS server, as
described at http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CachingNameserver .
I did choose to forward the requests to my ISP's DNS servers, since it
is a lot faster
WTF - and all your requests are coming from the ISP resolver and not
from your IP which is the reason that you should setup your own *caching
and recursing* nameserver
and *no* the ISP nameserver is *not* a lot faster in most cases
PEBCAK - problem exists between chair and keyboard
