Am 23.11.2015 um 13:04 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
Matthias Apitz skrev den 2015-11-23 10:43:meta RDNS_NONE (__RDNS_NONE && !__CGATE_RCVD && !__DOMINO_RCVD)meta RDNS_NONE (__RDNS_NONE && !(__CGATE_RCVD || __DOMINO_RCVD)) current rule will not work since both mta recieved must be negative not matching
and why would it not work? (a > 1 && !b && !c) as soon as not b *OR* not c the condition is untrue the intention is *NOT* fire RDNS_NONE when one of the other hits that's exactly what happens
with my meta it is possible still the same but more readelble
*lol* instead 2 simple and-conditions combine and/or with brackets more readable?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
