On Mar 8, 2016, at 7:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
how can these two stats be different?
On 08.03.16 10:19, @lbutlr wrote:
Because one is for SPAM and one is for HAM.
Why did you remove the important part?
TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
2 HTML_MESSAGE 12714 8.18 38.98 87.85 90.80
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
1 HTML_MESSAGE 16473 9.13 50.51 87.85 90.80
Why did the same rule hit 38.98% of all mail and 50.51% of all mail?
seems that the mail counts were different, but why?
did Charles generate stats at that very different times?
comparing results from the same set would be much better...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
A day without sunshine is like, night.
