> On Mar 8, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > >> On Mar 8, 2016, at 7:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: >>> how can these two stats be different? > > On 08.03.16 10:19, @lbutlr wrote: >> Because one is for SPAM and one is for HAM. > > Why did you remove the important part?
I didn’t. > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED > > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > > 2 HTML_MESSAGE 12714 8.18 38.98 87.85 90.80 > > TOP HAM RULES FIRED > > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM > > 1 HTML_MESSAGE 16473 9.13 50.51 87.85 90.80 > > > Why did the same rule hit 38.98% of all mail and 50.51% of all mail? Because on is checking SPAM and on is checking HAM. > seems that the mail counts were different, but why? Because there are differing amounts of SPAM and HAM? -- "Rosa sat, so Martin could walk. Martin walked, so Obama could run. Obama ran, so our children can fly." (paraphrased from NPR)
