Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:52 AM, A. Schulze <s...@andreasschulze.de> wrote: > > Alan Hodgson: > >> I really believe that's incorrect. Relaxed alignment specifically means >> you can >> sign with a subdomain's key or use a subdomain for SPF. >> >> Read sections 3.1.2 and 10.4 of that same document, for instance. > > Hm. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7489#section-10.4 reads like you're not > wrong. > I'll ask some dmarc professionals for clarification ...
I'm just now realizing that the DMARC rules I have been using are not part of spamassassin proper. In fact, there are apparently no DMARC rules as part of spamassassin. Why is that? The rules I'm using are quite dated and I'm now questioning whether they're correct. How are people using DMARC with spamassassin? I understand I could install a milter with my MTA, but I can't do that right now, and like the control that SA gives me. I also understand DMARC is error-prone with mailing lists and in other cases, which is another reason why I'd like to use it with SA. I recall some time ago there being a conversation about a DMARC plugin. Was that ever completed? Is it necessary? Thanks for any ideas. Alex
