Thanks in any case Bill...
Really appreciate all your help and time... Bill, John, Matus...
--------
Pedro
From: Bill Cole <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com>
To: "users@spamassassin.apache.org" <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Cc: Pedro David Marco <pedrod_ma...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: PYZOR_CHECK always have zero score, why?
On 19 Oct 2016, at 22:41, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Thanks Bill...
I wish it had been more helpful.
> tested...
>> 1. Add to local.cf, along with the other PYZOR_CHECK_2 lines you
>> had:>> tflags PYZOR_CHECK_2 net>>Does that change whether the
>> rule is hit?>>>2. Change the PYZOR_CHECK score line in 50_scores.cf
>> to:>> score PYZOR_CHECK 0.001 1.985 0.001 1.392>>Does that quiet
>> the warning about the meta rule?>>>>If Test #1 makes PYZOR_CHECK_2
>> NOT match a message that matched without >it, then something is
>> disabling 'net' rules and you need to find and >correct whatever is
>> doing that if you want SA to work well.
> PYZOR_CHECK_2 works well when tflag net is set...
>> If Test #2 silences the warning, you've found what is PROBABLY a
>> minor >cosmetic bug in SpamAssassin but MAY be a substantive one if
>> it means >that meta rule is being skipped as a result of having
>> detected the wrong >score in that line. Opening a bug report
>> at >https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ would be helpful.
> warning still present... :-(
Color me entirely mystified.
> This is a print Dumper of permsgstatus with a grep -i PYZOR:
[snip]
Hmmm... Relevant context of those lines is lost with grep, but they
confirm something odd is going on.
> so still wondering about the Dumper line: 'PYZOR_CHECK' =>
> '0',
That is strange, but it's not clear which hash that is from.
> i have even performed a ext4 fs deep check to discard any drive
> corruption issue....
I'm all out of ideas grounded in sanity.
