On 21/10/16 18:40, Paul Stead wrote:
On 21/10/16 16:22, John Hardin wrote:
I was going to say: you can't write a rule based on the *current* AWL
adjustment because that's calculated after all the rules have hit. But
SA *could* potentially have a rule that checks the current historical
average that AWL uses...
I suggest you file a New Feature bug to expose a mechanism to use the
current AWL average (not the per-message adjustment) in a rule.
Yikes, sorry in my haste I didn't read *AWL* ....
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AWL.html#template_tags
Paul
--
Paul Stead
Systems Engineer
Zen Internet
