>On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 19:02:09 -0000, Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net> wrote:
>As John has said, diversity makes the rules more accurate for more people. >Also many hands make light work. With more people involved there's not >such a requirement to contribute thousands of messages per person. I think the "barrier to entry" is too difficult for most. I would have to setup a new MX on a domain without MTA checks (DNS and RBL) then create a honeypot email address to attract spam if I didn't have established recipient addresses/mailboxes. Then I would have to setup an SA development environment with scripts to keep it up-to-date from SVN and compiled regularly. Finally I would need to manually categorize the ham and spam. I am capable of doing everything above and really want to help the mass- checking but it would be better if the "barrier to entry" is lower for everyone. If there were setup scripts (maybe there already is) or a VM that could be downloaded ready to use, that would help get more masscheckers going easily. For example, would it be possible to setup an iRedMail server VM (only takes a few minutes) that could be turned into this SA development environment for masschecking? This would quickly provide a separate mail server with an IMAP server and webmail interface for easy categorization of spam and ham. If so, then could someone point me to some documentation on setting up an SA development environment for masschecking? I have a domain that is about to be retired with a lot of addresses on spam lists that would be very good to attract spam and help the masscheck corpus.
