-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Hardin kirjoitti 20.1.2017 22:38:
> Collecting spam after RBL filtering is much less helpful to masscheck. > Ideally your spam corpus is from a totally unfiltered feed. > > However, even if it is filtered and small, it helps, *especially* if > the ham is not in English - masscheck is perennially starved for > non-English ham and rule scoring is thus baised against non-English > languages to a degree. This is NOT what I have learned from SA lists. I used to do this, but learned in SA discussions that it is *harmful* to pass such spam to masscheck. That it harms the SA users doing proper pre SA filtering. We do *need* an official policy! What are we going to do with mixed messages like this?? - -- ja...@iki.fi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAliDsbcACgkQKL4IzOyjSrbG1wCg8kbOuaUlyjogQw0Tm0bUGcNA nrUAoINhOU8+veBBzQlipYI657FMsXfW =2Fkw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
