The spample would never make it to our SA. It would be rejected upstream for at least two reasons:
> To: undisclosed recipients: ; The To header is not RFC compliant.The Subject header exceeds the maximum line length, being another RFC constraints. It is easy to catch spam this way. On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Ian Zimmerman <'i...@primate.net'> wrote: On 2017-02-06 20:06, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Last couple of weeks I saw some messages whose entire contents is in > > the Subject. > never seen such a monster. likely killed by some other piece in the > puzzle. Throw it up on pastebin? http://pastebin.com/PYaMcZa7 (I was wrong, the subject is actually one enormous line, it was my MUA that folded it.) -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign Don't clear-text sign: http://cr.yp.to/smtp/8bitmime.html
