On Tue, 2 May 2017, RW wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 09:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/2/2017 11:53 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was checking to see what the scores for mailspike were on my
server and I noticed that there are two sets of scores.
Is this expected?
50_scores is handcoded default scores, 72_scores is generated from
masscheck
That's what I thought, but what's the point of having handcoded
scores that are overridden by the generated scores?
Reasonable default values are always a good idea.
It looks like 72_scores only holds scores for rules from 72_active.cf
plus scores for MSPIKE rules and SURBL_BLOCKED (what's that doing
there?).
If 72_scores holds generated scores why are so many of then 1.000?
Limits?
You say that 50_scores is "handcoded default scores", but at the top
of the file there's a big block of scores that are claimed to have been
set by perceptron, which I understand fell-off a long time ago. They
certainly look autogenerated.
Check the revision history in SVN.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf
On the face of it it looks a lot of the rules I assumed were autoscored
are using scores generated years ago.
Potentially. I have not done a detailed review.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maxim IV: Close air support covereth a multitude of sins.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
6 days until the 72nd anniversary of VE day
