Apologies, I meant sa-learn. Brain fart.
Thanks for the clarification on the 3-point rule.
I've had a bunch of them come through. They all get autolearn=no or I get a
few that say "unavailable" like the sample below. I gather from trying to
figure out myself that unavailable may be things already learned. Or
something else whatever that may be, per the wiki. But if the database is
empty, it seems that "already learned" is not the reason for "unavailable"
in this case anyway.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=20.678 tag=-9999 tag2=5 kill=6.4
tests=[DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.076, DCC_CHECK=3.2,
DIGEST_MULTIPLE=0.001,
HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.635, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.105, MISSING_MID=0.14,
NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.365,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=2.43, RAZOR2_CHECK=2.5, RDNS_NONE=1.274,
SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=3, SUBJ_DOLLARS=0.001,
URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL=1.948] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Does this one have the requisite 3-point match? I don't understand how to
tell yet.
I've cleared the db again. Will let it run to see if it learns *anything*.
So far I have not seen that happen. Surely something will get a 3 way
match.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Bayes-auto-learn-not-happening-tp138065p138075.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
