OK, so I don't think auto-learn works on spam. What about HAM?
I've raised the floor to auto-learn HAM to 1. Before anyone gives me any
grief, it's just for testing. I'll rebuild the bayes db from a corpus when
I get it working.
So SPAM takes the 3-way patch, 3 from the header, 3 from the body. but what
about HAM. Since the default for autolearn is much lower than 6, I presume
this same limitation does not apply.
So hams should be free to auto-learn with any score that is below my
threshold (1).
Like this one, right? (assuming it is not already learned):
Aug 10 14:21:46 mail2 amavis[3231]: (03231-06) Passed CLEAN
{RelayedInbound}, [168.100.1.7]:43757 [173.167.109.218] ESMTP/LMTP
<owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org> -> <techlis...@myvirt.com>,
(ESMTPS://[168.100.1.7]:43757 < ESMTPS://173.203.187.85 < 173.167.109.218),
Queue-ID: 5EE363BF5, Message-ID:
<018901d3120d$c8473120$58d59360$@mefox.org>, mail_id: JkAvl418yTui, b:
ZbU4iXvCD, Hits: -5.799, size: 5533, queued_as: BD81F3EE7, Subject: "RE:
reloading postfix with systemd", From: <n...@mefox.org>, X-Mailer:
Microsoft_Outlook_16.0, helo=english-breakfast.cloud9.net, Tests:
[AM.WBL=-3,BAYES_05=-0.5,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3],
autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no, autolearnscore=-2.299, 4376 ms
Now this sender and a similar message would have been in my my corpus so I
don't expect IT to learn, but I'd expect others to.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Bayes-auto-learn-not-happening-tp138065p138261.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
