Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Did I miss something in the original problem description? Is that precisely >> what is being attempted here and yet it's not working? > > That is my understanding: > > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 22:15 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote: >> It seems that I encountered a bug in 'svnlook pl --revprop': it fails with >> the following message: >> >> $ svnlook pl --revprop -t 10547-86b /svn/test-svn >> svnlook: Invalid revision number '-1' > > I can replicate this error message with svn 1.6.9 on Mac OS X. "svnlook > pl -t" works fine, but "svnlook pl --revprop -t" complains that revision > number > '-1' is invalid, though I specified a correct in-progress transaction number.
Okay -- sorry for the noise, then. That was my fault for not parsing the conversation correctly. Yes, this I believe this is a bug. (I'll even grant that using an option named "--revprops" does nothing for the illusion that revisions aren't really just "special transactions".) -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
