C. Michael Pilato wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>>> Did I miss something in the original problem description? Is that >>>> precisely >>>> what is being attempted here and yet it's not working? >>> That is my understanding: >>> >>> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 22:15 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote: >>>> It seems that I encountered a bug in 'svnlook pl --revprop': it fails with >>>> the following message: >>>> >>>> $ svnlook pl --revprop -t 10547-86b /svn/test-svn >>>> svnlook: Invalid revision number '-1' >>> I can replicate this error message with svn 1.6.9 on Mac OS X. "svnlook >>> pl -t" works fine, but "svnlook pl --revprop -t" complains that revision >>> number >>> '-1' is invalid, though I specified a correct in-progress transaction >>> number. >> Okay -- sorry for the noise, then. That was my fault for not parsing the >> conversation correctly. >> >> Yes, this I believe this is a bug. (I'll even grant that using an option >> named "--revprops" does nothing for the illusion that revisions aren't >> really just "special transactions".) > > I think the attached patch fixes this, and I plan to commit as much after > some more testing.
Committed in r917640 and proposed for backport to 1.6.x. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
