Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:47:25 -0500: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > wrote: > > > >> > >> How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup? > > > > You'll get E155021. > > But only after it is too late, right? Are there any tools to check > this that don't overwrite the versions that might have still been able > to do something with the existing working copy? >
I don't understand the question. As a rule, when upgrade fails the working copy remains usable by the older version of svn. > >> And how should it be handled in multiuser scenarios where the svn > >> binaries are managed and updated by someone other than the people who > >> may have active working copies? > >> > > > > Have users always run 'svn cleanup' before they leave for the night on > > any wc's that they ^C'd during the day? > > Is that documented somewhere? > 1.7 release notes.
