On 08/27/2014 03:53 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
It's not that you can't use it, just that it can't protect you from the things that can happen through direct file system access. Like accidentally deleting the whole repo or changing ownership or permissions.
I don't see your point. There's also a likelihood that those accidents can happen on a remote server.
But regarding my question, if file:// is not intended to be used, as you and Stefan Sperling argued, then what are the available options for those who need a version control system and can't set up a server? Is it even possible to deploy subversion in that scenario?
Zé
