Both are correct in my eyes, just the information, that svn:ingore is listed by svn propget/proplist when using parameter --show-inherited-props, is missing. I would write something like:
...the patterns found in the svn:ignore property apply only to the directory on which that property is set, and not to any of its subdirectories, however it will still be listed by svn propget/proplist commands on subdirectories when using parameter --show-inherited-props. ---------- Původní e-mail ---------- Od: Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> Komu: Xsawer xsawer <xxsa...@seznam.cz> Kopie: users@subversion.apache.org Datum: 20. 3. 2023 20:38:07 Předmět: Re: Property svn:ignore reported as inherited by svn proplist " Den mån 20 mars 2023 kl 20:16 skrev Xsawer xsawer <xxsa...@seznam.cz (mailto:xxsa...@seznam.cz)>: " Well, one way or the other, proper documentation would do the job in this case. At minimum it should be clearly documented that --show-inherited-props lists properties which are set on parent folders and not really inherited. " +1 " ---------- Původní e-mail ---------- Od: Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com (mailto:daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com)> Komu: Xsawer xsawer <xxsa...@seznam.cz(mailto:xxsa...@seznam.cz)> Kopie: users@subversion.apache.org(mailto:users@subversion.apache.org) Datum: 20. 3. 2023 19:44:05 Předmět: Re: Property svn:ignore reported as inherited by svn proplist " Den mån 20 mars 2023 kl 19:04 skrev Xsawer xsawer <xxsa...@seznam.cz (mailto:xxsa...@seznam.cz)>: " " [...] " " " Documentation here says: ...the patterns found in the svn:ignore property apply only to the directory on which that property is set, and not to any of its subdirectories. https://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.advanced.props.special.ignore. html (https://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.advanced.props.special.ignore.html) On the other hand svn proplist --help says: --show-inherited-props : retrieve properties set on parents of the target Not a word about inheritance. " " " Can you suggest another wording (for either of these)? Kind regards, Daniel "
