Oops! I'm sorry, Massimo. I was up late last night coding that stuff, so I must have been a bit tired. I meant to reply to Marcus Matèrn. He was having an issue with rollbacks in Tapernate.
-----Original Message----- From: Massimo Lusetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:36 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: New version of Tapernate... On 5/24/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No problem! Just to be clear about why your situation is working now, I > removed the transaction interceptor from the persistence strategies and the > "squeezer." With transaction-per-request turned on, these features work > just fine. You can disable transaction-per-request, but I would imagine > that the majority of Tapernate users are using it. Again, Tapernate is a > "work in progress", so I'm trying to figure out the best way to get around > this issue. I really don't like the fact that the Spring transaction > interceptor throws an exception. I think I can let it just go by without > rolling back the transaction and without throwing an exception. I'll try to > figure that out. Well James i think you mistaken person, but my thanks goes anyway! :) -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
