Ok, thanks, that help. Last question: Is it easy to change the UI after Trails generate the page ? Because, we have some specific needs. We won't use the simple layout Trails give after the generation. We need to modify the ui to reflect our needs.
Thanks ! ----- Original Message ---- From: Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Tapestry users <[email protected]>; Carl Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 10:19:46 AM Subject: Re: Trails I only use trails for my Tapestry-4 development. Mainly because I enjoyed the steep initial learning curve of tapestry and needed something to lean on. The main reason I liked and like trails is because the ant scripts together with hibernate tools generate all tables in my MySQL database automatically from my POJOs. I just need to grok how to @annotate right, which in itself have been interresting, so all lookup tables, collections, relations, etc. gets done. Another big goodie is that trails have a default list, search and edit page for all POJOs, which are plain Tapestry html/page combos. Also, there are ant/maven tasks to generate individual list or edit pages for POJOs. Then theres the fairly easy to use acegi security (I use a separate site to the same database for "unsecure" pages out of lazyness), with an ant task to add and another to initialize (create default tables for admin, etc.) Really, I can't see why you _souldn't_ use trails for everything and then changes the bits you need to change. If you need to do heavy whiz-bang end-user pages, at least you'll have your administrative pages for free. Cheers, PS On 6/6/06, Carl Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everyone, I'm looking for feedback here, I planning of using Trails to help gain speed with my Tapestry 4.0 development. Somebody use it? Should I ? What are the pinfall ? What are your advise... Thanks for your feedback
