Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:24:52 -0300, Renat Zubairov > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Let me explain it from _my_ personal point of view. >> 1. Investments in T4 are lost. Application will not be portable to T5. > > i can't figure out why investment in a framework will be lost when a new, > incompatible version of it is released. tapestry 4.1 will not disappear > when t5 is released. t4.x has many useful first- and third-party > components (and developers experience) already available, [...]
It's just the perception of most people that there should be continuous evolution instead of a revolution. That has been discussed here before. T5 is called Tapestry, but the term "Tapestry" is more a brand name, than the name of the product in this case. Personally I don't care about the issue. T5 is something completely new and using it or not is the same question as switching or starting to use another framework. So it's a nice opportunity for new projects, but a switch should not be considered - from my point of view as a user - for stuff that's in production - at least at the present stage. And ... After all it's open source and one should be prepared to participate in the maintenance of such frameworks - there is no vendor guaranteeing anything. It's a voluntary and community effort. If someone is talking about "investment" then that would mean time - not money - and everybody is free to help with the maintenance while others might move on to something new. Stephan -- http://www.stephan-schwab.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5-vs-T4-vs-Community-tf3436664.html#a9586744 Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
