Em Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:40:38 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
This is heading a bit backwards from my initial goals, of naming
conventions over annotations, and raises the question of the convention
for naming such methods,
I think that to rely just on naming conventions has a serious
disadvantage: one typo and the method is not invoked when it should.
Your example with annotations, copied below, has the con of letting the
developer choose some bad method name. On the other hand, it's almost
impossible get the contribution wrong: the compiler checks if FooBar is an
existing class, something that wouldn't happen using just naming
conventions.
@Contribute(FooBar.class)
public void whatWouldYouCallThis(Configuration<FooBarDatum>
configuration) {
Thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
