Geoff Callender wrote:
Yes, I've been thinking of doing that. Not sure what I'd do about the
elements that update the DB, though. Concurrency isn't a problem for
the system but it might be for the user experience - when user A goes
from the edit screen to the display screen of an example they may see
unexpected values thanks to user B, C and D editing the same objects
in the same example. Hmmm...
Just call the demo a "collaborative edition platform", and you are
done. Web 2.0 save us from all this transactive mess :)
--
Francois Armand
Etudes & Développements J2EE
Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com
Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28
-----------
InterLDAP - http://interldap.org
FederID - http://www.federid.org/
Open Source identities management and federation
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
