In case I wasn't clear, I was referring to the "traditional" binary
downloads; they now include the Tapestry JARs, 3rd party JARs, and
source JARs (for the Tapestry code).

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is especially true for 5.0.11, where the dependencies of
>  tapestry-ioc and tapestry-core are bundled with those libraries.  so
>  you can be up and running from the binary download very quickly
>  (still, the Maven support for setting up the project template is very
>  nice).
>
>
>
>  On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Martin Kersten
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > Tapestry works well without Maven. You dont need it.
>  >  Just drop all required libraries into the lib-path and you are done.
>  >  Also I would like to add that developing using tomcat also works well.
>  >
>  >  -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>  >  Von: Daniel Jue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 16:43
>  >  An: Tapestry users
>  >  Betreff: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  I've made the stub page, and I've tried to keep it marketing-free and of 
> course honest.  Smart project managers are going to ask when you _would not_ 
> want to use a particular framework, and potential users should be able to get 
> that kind of information from us easily.
>  >
>  >  Those of you with experience with other frameworks can add to it.
>  >
>  >  Feel free to change any part of it.
>  >
>  >  http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/FrameworkComparisons?action=show
>  >
>  >  On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Stroeber, Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>  >  > Hi,
>  >  >
>  >  >  Why not just simply add a page to the Tapestry homepage with arguments 
> for/against tapestry?
>  >  >  Everyone who really is interested in informations and differences 
> between * and Tapestry could have a look at and anyone who wants to ignore 
> 'trolls' can do so and/or send the url.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Even a link-list with articles about different frameworks would do. 
> Everyone should be able to pick the best framework for his needs. And every 
> troll perhaps answers questions that can be answered by or added to the 
> page/link list.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Last but not least every serious engineer will find arguments 
> for/against tapestry by himself. If he hasn't enough arguments, he should 
> call into question whether Tapestry IS the right framework for what he/she 
> wants to do. A summary page or link-list to articles just could make 
> search/things easier for him. But always he will have to decide himself.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Grz
>  >  >  Andi
>  >  >
>  >
>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>  >  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>  --
>  Howard M. Lewis Ship
>
>  Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind
>



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to