Jumpstart is great, especially for looking some techniques up and see how certain details are done. But does it really suit as a single Tutorial application where you go from nil to something useable?
2009/1/19 Peter Stavrinides <p.stavrini...@albourne.com> > I think Jumpstart covers a lot of ground, and is the quickest and most > efficient way to learn Tapestry (whats more useful than looking at actual > code), its been around for a while, ao its evolution means it documents best > practices. Now that it runs with Jetty, I say use Jumpstart and strip out > anything thats excess (EJB etc). > > Peter > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Geoff Callender" <geoff.callender.jumpst...@gmail.com> > To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org> > Sent: Sunday, 18 January, 2009 17:16:48 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, > Bucharest, Istanbul > Subject: Re: [T5] improve documentation > > I completely agree too. A search facility of the existing site would > be a huge leap forward. > > On 16/01/2009, at 9:23 AM, Szemere Szemere wrote: > > > Completely agree with the sentiments expressed. Too often I've had > > to use > > Google or similar to find what I'm looking for in the Tapestry > > documentation. Having it split across at least 4 different places > > and in > > some places confused with Tapestry4 is awkward. > > Szemere > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
