Hi Dave, your message made me doubt and I immediately tried that out (on IE 6 and FF 2). I was not able to reproduce, what you were implying. So I still think that redirect after post solves the problem.
Regards nillehammer Dave Greggory schrieb: > Redirect-after-post does not really solve that problem because if you hit > Back button twice, you still get the same problem. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: nillehammer <tapestry.nilleham...@winfonet.eu> > To: Tapestry users <users@tapestry.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 7:15:38 PM > Subject: Re: Implication of client side redirect > > Hi Dave, > > I am afraid I disagree with you on this point. Even when validation > fails, redirect after post does make sense. Although you're right that > double submission is not a problem when validation fails. If you respond > directly to a post, the post will get into the browser's history. This > is a problem when the browser's back button is used. This would result > in the ugly dialogue "Do you want to send formdata again..." popping up. > This can only be avoided by never directly responding to a post-request. > > Regards, nillehammer > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- http://www.winfonet.eu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
